The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuels should be the most important global priority today To what extent do you agree or disagree

The extensive use of fossil fuels and the enormous tolls following it has attracted the attention of the governments to explore the more efficient alternatives to non-renewable fuels. This essay will argue why this measure should be put in the states' priority.
The effects of global warming and climate change on ecosystem relevant to applying fossil fuels have been increasing. By burning these fuels emit harmful air pollutants, so carbon dioxide emissions trap heat in the atmosphere and lead to climate change which can put in dangerous many animal species. Furthermore, annuals many aquatics are destroyed due to the contaminants arising by leaking non-renewable energies on the ocean and making it more acidic. Besides, the ruthless exploitation of energy resources leads to destroying our planet. Unearthing, processing, and moving underground oil, gas, and coal deposits take enormous complications on our landscapes and ecosystems. So, inasmuch as the problems caused by overusing unsustainable energies is a global dilemma, resolving this issue will be possible only by cooperating all of the countries in the whole of the world.
Although abundant exploitation of resources is a critical issue throughout the world, many developing countries struggle with serious problems like poverty, drought, inflation and illiterate. Hence, maybe trying to alleviate these problems, prevents them from exploring an alternative for fossil fuels, in other words, it is not their priority.
According to all complications mentions the use of non-renewable resources, it seems that governments should do the necessary actions to mitigate the effects of them. While it is a global dilemma and considering that developed countries have fewer difficulties, in my opinion, developed countries must prioritize coping with it.

Votes
Average: 9 (7 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'states'' or 'state's'?
Suggestion: states'; state's
...e why this measure should be put in the states priority. The effects of global warmin...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 831, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ue will be possible only by cooperating all of the countries in the whole of the world. A...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, while, in my opinion, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6496350365 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10551989573 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631386861314 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0259414377 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16038854347 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525984633639 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412349896307 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0987817611423 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285024484337 0.056905535591 50% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.