Many old buildings are protected by law because they are part of nation's history.However, some people think old buildings should be knocked down to make way for new ones because people need houses and offices.How important is t to maintain old buildings?

Essay topics:

Many old buildings are protected by law because they are part of nation's history.
However, some people think old buildings should be knocked down to make way for new ones because people need houses and offices.
How important is t to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?

Taking for granted that a large number of old buildings deem as treasures for many nations because they were built thousand years ago. Hence, a vigorous debate has been sparked over whether these old building should be demolished or not. In my opinion, it is absolutely essential to maintain them as they are an integral part of the history, but this does not mean to halt the advance.

Undoubtedly, keeping old buildings has a historical significance, for they provide an insight into the history. Thus, citizens can relish their architectural heritage. Moreover, these old buildings contribute to promoting tourism owing to their classical architecture, so it will revive the economy. For example, one of the oldest buildings in Egypt is the Pyramids that attract tourists from foreign countries to see these wonders. As a result, by protecting old buildings, not only will they boost tourism, but they also will shape the character of the country. However, a question must be asked, could the history impede progress?

To achieve progress, there are sundry ways, but destroying old buildings is not one of them. To enumerate, old building could be refurbished in order to be consistent with modern architecture by using technological advancement in construction. For example, in England, classical buildings are adjacent to the modern building which give a picturesque view. As a result, by virtue of old buildings, the nation will preserve their historical heritage and enhance the development.

In conclusion, old buildings play an important role in forming the character of a country. Accordingly, I believe old buildings should be protected due to their great values, and the history could stand side by side to progress.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
Taking for granted that a large number of old buildings deem as treasures for man...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...or many nations because they were built thousand years ago. Hence, a vigorous debate has...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'essential'.
Suggestion: essential
...demolished or not. In my opinion, it is absolutely essential to maintain them as they are an integra...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28880866426 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96502658647 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58844765343 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.0147284931 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416515497993 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138716691754 0.084324248473 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666787584878 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267375891304 0.151304729494 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289553933483 0.056905535591 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.