In recent years, have been observed a tremendous increase in the consumption of fast food all around the world. However, there remains some disagreement on whether the impact of fast food has been an advantage or disadvantage. In this essay, I intend to argue that the drawbacks of the fast food far outweighs its benefits.
On the one hand, it is an indisputable fact that consumers fast food pursue the risky eating habit which leads to excess results in health problems. Fast foods, which are incredibly high in fat and salt, are responsible for gaining weight, rising blood fat and blood pressure that can earn irreparable damages for human bodies. One particularly good example of this is a published report from the world health organization (WHO) in which almost 13.2 of mortality in whole the world stem from obstruction of the heart arteries due to the fat which leads to heart attack. Hence, by enhancing the rate of consuming fast foods, the rate of mortality is on the increase. Admittedly, the advantage of fast food should be considered.
In contrast, fast foods are more affordable and convenient compared to traditional foods. For Example, most of the fast food restaurants provide foods to half price to the students, so such foods are a reasonable choice for college students who have a restricted budget. Also, these proper opt for the businessman who has a limited time for eating. Therefore, the low cost and convenience are both advantages of fast foods that play a key role in increasing the pace of life.
By way of conclusion, the detrimental effect of fast foods is proved and we have to mitigate while sometimes eating them is an inevitable issue. Once again I reaffirm my position that fast foods have negative influences because of their excess salty and oily compounds whereas are convenient and affordable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...owever, there remains some disagreement as to whether the impact of fast food has been an adv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Such
...nvenient compared to traditional foods. such foods are a reasonable choice for colle...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, so, therefore, whereas, while, as to, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96478873239 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75398036587 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584507042254 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9670398334 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.461538462 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168057736266 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638202042849 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379248507285 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107858819125 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445357455857 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.