Fewer and fewer young people are choosing to become teachers. Why do young people not want to be a teacher? How this could be changed?
In today’s industrialized world, it is undeniable fact that younger generation prefer working for advanced field of technology or medical sciences, leaving a minor proportion of them joining the field of academics. There are numerous factors behind this negative development. In this essay I shall enlist potential reasons behind this trend, followed by proposing certain viable solutions to improve the deteriorating conditions.
Firstly, the most vital factor behind younger generation avoid being a teacher is the meager remunerations it brings. Furthermore, life of a teacher is believed to be stagnant, lacking opportunities and promotions making it a less lucrative career profession. Secondly, academic instructor’s profession is projected as mundane lacking excitements and challenges. On the contrary, in current times, professionals are often inclined towards challenging and exciting careers. Thirdly and more importantly, number of institutions and universities are relatively fewer, with handful of openings for fresh teachers. As a result, knowing the fact that there are no ample future openings, students does not opt this career at first place.
On the other hand, public authorities in collaboration with citizenry can solve this problem in three ways. First and foremost by increasing budgetary allocation on this noble field and provide lucrative increase in pay scales along with additional benefits, similar to what an engineer working for multinational company receives. More importantly, education sector must expand itself by opening newer branches with more openings and promotions. Finally, institutions must collaborate with other international institutions providing training sessions attracting youngsters to join this field.
To conclude, since the time immemorial, teaching professions is and will always be considered a noble profession. However, due to unattractive financial benefits along with inappropriate promotion policies made younger blood stray away from this profession. However, revamped policies along with revised financial planning can restore its lost glory.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1823.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 6.07666666667 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20949113308 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673333333333 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4122796159 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.9375 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101423155653 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0329429542163 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310227034287 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0580461704635 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360806493714 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.98 12.4159519038 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.9 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.