It has been claimed that workers over 50 are not responsive to rapidly changing ideas in the modern workplace and that for this reason younger workers are to be preferred. Do you agree or disagree with the statement?
In today’s modernized world, where businesses around the world are achieving unprecedented levels of innovations, requiring extreme levels of agility in business model. To do so, certain section of corporate sector believes that only younger generation of workers suits such work environment. Whereas, others have contrasting views. In my opinion, for any business to prosper, a perfect mix of all age groups is necessary.
Firstly, it is undeniable fact that experienced professionals over 50 years, generally possess better business understanding and decision making capabilities. Therefore, responsiveness and business agility is an outcome of smart business decisions which are made better by elder employees. For instance, leaders and executive members of most multinational companies are senior people, such as Larry Page of Oracle Technologies and Narayana Murthy of Infosys Technologies both are over 50 years of age. Secondly, the art of responsiveness and innovation is independent of age and is rather related to an individual’s zeal towards innovation. Furthermore, in a business, various roles are acquired by different age groups. For example, positions such as Project Manager, Team Lead and Senior consultant requires aged professionals, this in no means imply that they lack business agility. Whereas, the contrary may be true.
On the other hand, certain job roles, demanding strenuous workload alongside extreme vitality suits younger blood. For instance, positions such as software engineer, mechanical technicians and construction site engineers are generally apt for junior candidates. However, to assist them in right direction, senior management having capabilities of taking strategic decisions are incumbent. More importantly, a fundamental reason behind business having inclination towards hiring youngsters, is the fact that they are comparatively cheaper, yielding to better corporate savings. However, such business model may not yield optimum results in longer run.
To conclude, for a business to truly achieve its vision along with maintaining high standards of service, it is necessary to have balanced experience of various age groups. Furthermore, seniors have had enormous influence in uplifting various top class organization in all facades of businesses. Therefore, a fine blend of seniors and juniors is a basic prerequisite for any business model.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...of workers suits such work environment. Whereas, others have contrasting views. In my o...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 816, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "requires aged" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'aging' or 'to be aged'.
Suggestion: aging; to be aged
...eam Lead and Senior consultant requires aged professionals, this in no means imply t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 892, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... imply that they lack business agility. Whereas, the contrary may be true. On the ot...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2060.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88571428571 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2318365285 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631428571429 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0396190649 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.421052632 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4210526316 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26315789474 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113555539373 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.031704188265 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0276373762958 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0656707812361 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221079427323 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.