Films were produced by big companies in the past, but today people are able to make a film. Do you think this trend is positive or negative?.
Thanks to the ever-increasing development of technology, not just giant companies can produce films, individuals can do too. Although many people think that the trend can bring many negative impacts on a wide variety of social aspects, personally I think there are many benefits in this case.
On the one hand, if more people are film producers, certain watchers, especially children can be affected adversely by the harmful content of these films. The reason is that the more private people produce films, the more difficult authorities can censor the content of films. For example, nowadays a great deal of individual are usually posting violent videos on children’s websites, thus effecting adversely on children’s development and can develop a violent personality in kids. Besides, the lack of controlling films can bring political disorders. In fact, a number of terrorist take advantage and spread videos having violent and anti-government contents which could threaten the stability of social security.
On the other hand, I think the trend that more individuals take part in manufacturing films can benefit both private producers and watchers. Firstly, people can earn a large amount of money from making films. For instance, well-known youtubers have become rich when they posted a lot of interesting videos. Another benefit is that watchers can enjoy more abundant and realistic videos. Many overseas travelers film their experience and their feelings of culture and cuisine in other countries all over the world. As a result, watchers could gain more reliable information of other nations.
In conclusion, while other people think that personal filmmaking can have negative consequences, I argue that there are a lot of benefits from this trend.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, if, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46909090909 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93737162547 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570909090909 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3016379284 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.428571429 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185129003761 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665241178202 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590532248138 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130895971404 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037973051951 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.