for school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The development of children’s intelligence and social skills are built by a wide variety of factor and other people around, especially their tutors and parents. Some people argue that teachers have more effects on students’ development of intelligence and social knowledge than their mother and father. I totally dispute with this statement, I believe that students’ intelligent and social development are affected by their parents rather than ones’ teachers.
Some individuals put forward the view that teachers can make more significant contributions to the intelligence and social improvement of school children than their relatives. Firstly, educators who are trained pedagogy skills of their professional areas know a number of ways to impact students’ knowledge and develop imaginative ways. Such effective methods can stimulate children’s academic abilities. In addition, the young generation can cultivate social skills by helping and guidance from their tutors. For example, in national history lessons, students can be taught a great deal of knowledge of history events which happened in various ancient periods. As a result, they could improve social knowledge such as their national culture, thus showing respect toward cultural values as well as their ancients.
I am convinced that parents seem to be more important than teachers to children’s intelligence and social enhancement. Firstly, parents can stimulate the learning process of their children. In fact, although at school teachers imparted their knowledge to students, pupils will not remember the knowledge without support from their family. Furthermore, parents can play a major role in students’ social development. The main reason is that they spend far more time with their children than any individual teacher is able to do. Therefore, they can monitor the activities of children outside school hours, at the weekend and during holiday and teach them how to behave properly like showing respect toward elders or proper behaviours in public.
In conclusion, some people think that teachers are the main factor contributing to children’s intelligence and social development. However, I argue that parents have more impacts on the two factors than individual tutors.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1953.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7610619469 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09611718881 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536873156342 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.438621227 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.882352941 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9411764706 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.17647058824 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.4147187925 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152524264723 0.084324248473 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0900318021346 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271523274462 0.151304729494 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725959365771 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.