Many foods are shipped from far away. Some people think that eating local food is more environmentally and economically. Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages?
Many people assume that it is beneficial to the environment and economy if residents consume food in their own areas. However, there are also a wide variety of disadvantages in this case, and I think the drawbacks outweigh its merits.
On the one hand, some individuals argue that eating local cuisine can play a significant role in the preservation of the environment. In fact, delivering food in long-distance need packaging to cover dishes, which results in the land, water pollution as the increase in a large number of non-biodegradable rubbishes released into the environment. Furthermore, they also think that this way can save a lot of money. For example, when they have lunch at a local restaurant, they will not have to pay for shipping fee while enjoying various delicious foods. And then they could spend the amount of money on other purposes such as education and entertainment.
On the other hand, I personally think that there are more disadvantages in the case of just using local food. The most obvious consequence is that local people will have fewer opportunities to enjoin various specialists from other areas. It is serious that if this condition lasted for a long time in countries which do not have developed agriculture filed, the citizens could face the shortage of food. Furthermore, a country will not advertise and export their agricultural products when others do not consume food derived from other countries. As a result, the country would lose a large amount of income from exporting its products which play a vital role in its economic prospect.
In conclusion, although not eating delivered food can be a benefit to many aspects of human life, I suppose that its disadvantages are more than its advantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hink the drawbacks outweigh its merits. On the one hand, some individuals argue ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...and, water pollution as the increase in a large number of non-biodegradable rubbishes released in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, then, while, for example, i suppose, i think, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06574394464 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96691364847 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550173010381 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6689416694 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.615384615 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1538461538 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327910881813 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107955545031 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700653633818 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19806305673 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406800660187 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.