The first man to walk on the moon said it was a great step for mankind in the last century. But in fact, space travel has made little difference to most peoples lives today. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
While half a century ago Soviet cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin orbited the globe making history, the Britisher’s then were busy colonising and buy fish and chips for a penny. Even today, space travel is a vulnerable industry and I agree that the progress has not benefited the masses and does not justify its expenses. This essay will discuss the merit of this position in the following paragraphs.
Those decrying about resources wasted in space travel programs highlight the lack of ostensible benefits to common man. Enormous funds used to develop and maintain space stations or sending a human to Mars for colonising does nothing to an average individual struggling to survive. For instance, a construction field men might struggle to keep up with the inflation or sudden economic downturn. Many people may view the NASA videos occasionally, hardly justifying the spends of billions of dollars on space quests. The funds could have made a real difference if diverted in other fields such as medicine, infrastructure, or education.
Nonetheless, the effects pertain deeply to culture and science. Firstly, the race to send a man to moon was purely for a country’s pride, power, and space control. Secondly, although the benefits of scientific recoveries have benefited mankind. For instance, satellites used for transmitting signals are making phone call and internet accessible for connectivity. Thus, some degree of justification can be provided to national funding of space exploration, but space hotel or travel is a colossal waste.
In conclusion, the race for novel scientific discoveries is import for the progress of mankind but spending billions for a 10-minute space ride on Virgin Galactic is unwanted. Funds can rather be effectively utilized in other research fields that directly contribute to basic human requirements.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 636, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...medicine, infrastructure, or education. Nonetheless, the effects pertain deeply ...
^^^
Line 3, column 505, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce hotel or travel is a colossal waste. In conclusion, the race for novel scient...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38888888889 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96148599618 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652777777778 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.462146568 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.466666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19426378449 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576211953445 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434895108922 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111364760437 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279570956969 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.