Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the management of cultural and historical attractions tends to distinguish the fare of entrance based on where the visitors come from. The foreign tourists are charged higher price while the local ones pay less to enjoy these attractions. Considering the intensity of visitation and the purpose to help countries, I believe that imposing higher fee for foreigners when they visit the cultural sites and historical sites in some countries is acceptable.
The first reason to agree this issue is regarding the intensity of tourists to visit these attractions. There is a high possibility that local people visit the same sites more often, while the foreigner travellers tend to visit them only once, and they continue to visit another place. For instance, the local inhabitants in Bali usually visit the cultural shows once in a week as their cultural obligation, and they are charged cheaper fee to sustain their visits. For the result, although foreigners don’t come intensively, the income is still enough to fulfill the tourism sites’ necessity
Another reason worth to mention is related to the purpose of helping some countries to gain income from these kinds of tourism. Some poor countries rely on establishing historical sites and cultural shows as the potential income, and the foreigners whom majority of them are from rich countries prefer to these attractions. The government of Thailand imposes the higher fare for tourists who want to enjoy their museums and traditional performance to gain more income, while the local people who are mostly relieved only pay less or free in charge.
To sum up, the implementation of charging higher price for foreign travellers is agreed due to the intensity of tourists in visiting these tourism places and the objective to help some poor countries in gaining more revenue from tourism
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ging higher price for foreign travellers is agreed due to the intensity of touris...
^^
Line 4, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g these tourism places and the objective to help some poor countries in gaining m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, regarding, so, still, while, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24161073826 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75160418955 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479865771812 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.7614721584 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.2 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8 20.7667163134 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20590124835 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921177119542 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0287552270809 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136964156301 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464192589622 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.