Nowadays, people are getting more fascinated for traveling historical place all over the world. In that case it is agree that overseas visitors should charge more than local visitor for visiting any historical monument. Every thought has some flip side. So, I am partly disagree with idea and on the base of that I will explain my views.
First of all, in the standard justification as local residence paying to country for maintaining historical attractions through tax, visitor also paying to country with their food, transport tourist guides as well. So, they are also contributing economically like local. Therefore, I think charging more to foreign visitor will be unfair. Another side if they know that one, they will lose interest to visit, as a result nation will not get the economic support. For example, Bali and Indonesia taking equal charge from foreign visitor that is why they get more visitors while mean they get more financial benefit from overseas.
Moreover, if any country treats visitor un equality it will hamper the value of the country internationally. But tourist is paying a important role to make a place as well as a country remarkable. For instance, Dubai always charge all the visitors same as a result now Dubai known as a world most beautiful city all over the world and it also get expo 2020. Thus, any nation should not charge more to the local.
On the flip side, it is normal that local visitor may visit a place more than a foreigner. So, same government charge more to them. For highlight, we can tell that local visitor of Thailand visit their historical place almost every week but overseas only may be visit one time.
In conclusion, I want to tell that it is depend on the country how they want to treat with visitors, but everybody should aware about the reputation of the historical place of a country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
... all over the world. In that case it is agree that overseas visitors should charge mo...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...ght has some flip side. So, I am partly disagree with idea and on the base of that I wil...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'treats'' or 'treat's'?
Suggestion: treats'; treat's
... overseas. Moreover, if any country treats visitor un equality it will hamper the ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... internationally. But tourist is paying a important role to make a place as well ...
^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'gets'?
Suggestion: gets
...ful city all over the world and it also get expo 2020. Thus, any nation should not ...
^^^
Line 9, column 42, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...n conclusion, I want to tell that it is depend on the country how they want to treat w...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84905660377 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55328096785 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512578616352 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.111317553 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7058823529 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7058823529 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0588235294 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316432444346 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109800743651 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989841728263 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183646315456 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855671689586 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.