Educational degrees demands are increasing day by day, people have various about pedagogical system. Plethora people think in general education, from kindergarten to college student spent time in theory then practical section. But others have positive views. So, I will explain my both points of view in the topic.
On the one hand, several nations are one the support of our regular education system which give the student opportunity to achieve a clear understanding. On various subjects after knowing about the subject they can learn in practical. For example, students can not test any product or chemical in laboratory unless they have enough knowledge about chemical reactions or materials character. So, before practical knowledge theorical study most needed.
Moreover, our education system help student to fix their goal, show then the way of study. Most importantly it makes different students’ skill and ability on the base of age. Such as, primary students are not nature physically. On mentally for the project which can be handed of university student. For those reason we can take the sides of the way of education has been followed over the years.
On the other hand, masses of people believe that education system should focus on practical then formula base study. Because practical help to be student creative and innovative and the study topic easily set on mind they learn practically. In order that they can achieve better occupation in future. Only book reading is just wanting of time sometimes. For instance, most of the lesson student learn in school like math formula and geography have no use in future life.
On conclusion, I want to tell that education organization should focus on practical and theorical study for student’s better future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...my both points of view in the topic. On the one hand, several nations are one...
^^^
Line 4, column 392, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , before” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...mical reactions or materials character. So, before practical knowledge theorical study mos...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on has been followed over the years. On the other hand, masses of people beli...
^^^
Line 9, column 242, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[7]
Message: “In order that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ily set on mind they learn practically. In order that they can achieve better occupation in f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 291, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...that they can achieve better occupation in future. Only book reading is just wanting of t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eography have no use in future life. On conclusion, I want to tell that educa...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, then, for example, for instance, in general, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28671328671 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70935480373 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597902097902 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6213543598 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.5789473684 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0526315789 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94736842105 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147467614433 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434069055993 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364762579816 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0843049308389 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355364203789 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.81 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.