From last decade, topic that whether foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attraction, is catching significant attention of public and government body. Although, myriad of people believe that for cultural and historical places, everyone should be charged equally. Still, many have opinion, that localities should get at least some benefit at this point.
In one hand, it is reasonable to expect that overseas visitors are paying always more than local visitors, as they are mostly coming from wealthy background. In many countries, cultural and historical places are a profitable business. In order to earn more money, they put two type of fee structure, one is for overseas visitors and another one is for local visitors. According to me, cultural and historical attraction is responsibility of government. In spite of taking full responsibility of these places, sometimes government try to make it self dependent and self sufficient body. Therefore, to make it self dependent in real sense, authority of those places have to issue rules regarding different entry fee structure for both kind of visitors.
On the other hand, nevertheless, it is obvious to say that for cultural and historical attraction, every visitors should be treated equally. Authorities of those places should not forget the fact that foreign visitors are coming all the way from their country and have already spent on travelling. Therefore, they should have full right of equal treatment.
In the conclusion, I would like to say that all the historical places should be solely responsibility of government, lets not treat it as a profitable business. Hence, all the visitors be it foreigners or local visitors should pay equally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rical places are a profitable business. In order to earn more money, they put two ...
^^
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
... and another one is for local visitors. According to me, cultural and historical attraction is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 543, Rule ID: IT_SELF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'itself'?
Suggestion: itself
...laces, sometimes government try to make it self dependent and self sufficient body. Th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 580, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ke it self dependent and self sufficient body. Therefore, to make it self depende...
^^
Line 3, column 607, Rule ID: IT_SELF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'itself'?
Suggestion: itself
...lf sufficient body. Therefore, to make it self dependent in real sense, authority of t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, therefore, at least, kind of, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37184115523 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8978580188 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509025270758 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7122301626 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.285714286 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368081726261 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134788691313 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104136414952 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246386454725 0.151304729494 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770021644008 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.