For several decades, fossil fuel supplies the energy of most parts of the world. However, some governments persuade energy consumers to use the older option as a source of energy. Whilst, l believe that this has some benefits in several cases, I presume that renewable energy may give rise to some downsides.
On the one hand, there is various positive effect by use of rechargeable energies. First of all, most governments encourage people to use renewable sources, which are mostly environmentally friendly. As is self-explanatory, most of the fossil fuel emits carbon dioxide when burned, which is caused huge damage to the environment. renewable energies such as solar or wind powers differ from fossil energies are considered to be environmentally friendly, contributing to the protection of nature. Furthermore, the rechargeable power sources, as their name shows, can reproduce themselves quickly. It is a true fact, fossil fuels need more than 10 millennials to be replaced. However, the most alternative options are rapidly producing. These kinds of advantages can encourage the authorities to use them more.
On the other hand, these kinds of energy sources can contribute to some adverse. Firstly, governments have the desire to use nuclear power as a source of energy, which has much concern. For instance, the radioactive which is radiated by the nuclear reactor, resulting in many diseases and disasters. Secondly, most renewable sources are not reliable. For example, Solar rays and the wind blowing is not accessible in many situations, because of the weather condition dependency. So it is hard to trust them. Finally, the structures of renewable energy sources such as nuclear power factories, Solar panels, or windmill turbines are so costly, and the authorities must expend a huge amount of the budget in them, while they can found for all their key issues like education and healthcare systems.
In contrast, it is my conviction that replacing fossil fuels with renewable sources have both desired and adverse effects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Renewable
... caused huge damage to the environment. renewable energies such as solar or wind powers d...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in contrast, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32407407407 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94722382216 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561728395062 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.1418944132 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7894736842 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0526315789 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94736842105 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276163868263 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846534092285 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633521173186 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17564799056 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542424593817 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.