In the future, it seem more difficult to live on the earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planet to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Nowadays, the question of whether space projects should be invested for extraterrestrial life for humans in the future or not has sparked considerable public debate. Although researching other planet is not without disadvantaged, it merits can justify these.
There are some compelling reasons that are cited to support the fact that more money should be spent on looking for new planet. First, since there are a shortage of shelter for whole of inhabitants in the world, researching other planet such as Mars can help people tackle this problem. This means that the human population will increase significantly with current demographic trends, which make demand for houses tend to rise meanwhile the ground is going down by sea encroachment. Second, by conducting space research, we have the chance to discover new resources on other planets. Plenty of evidence suggests that fossil fuels and other natural resources on the Earth which are still inevitable in the process of manufacturing will eventually be depleted, which make decline to the living standards of people. So researching new planet is necessary.
Investing to space projects is welcomed is reinforced by more supporting evidence below. In addition, if space programmes help people to find the habitable planet, people can make a recovery for the Earth. In fact, when part of the population moves to the new planet, trees which are planted in lieu of infrastructure will prevent climate change from global warming, environmental contamination,.. which will protect human survival. Furthermore, in order to the fact that there are the shelter for future generations, space projects contribute to promote the proliferation of technology. For example, satellites were created to explore planets and thus impulse research and the development of more advanced technologies to conquer the universe, which can provide new programmes in a range of fields to improve the quality of life.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that it make more sense for looking for new planets for humans, for the reasons provided above. By investing more money for space projects, people will have faith for the good future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
Nowadays, the question of whether space projects should be invested for e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 395, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...bal warming, environmental contamination,.. which will protect human survival. Fur...
^^
Line 5, column 396, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...al warming, environmental contamination,.. which will protect human survival. Furt...
^^
Line 5, column 399, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...warming, environmental contamination,.. which will protect human survival. Furthermor...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 399, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...warming, environmental contamination,.. which will protect human survival. Furthermor...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, look, second, so, still, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1831.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35380116959 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93509727362 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2003681893 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.4375 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205593956296 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756324020363 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553426673428 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130221786575 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635655209888 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.