In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
Although it is absolutely important to value our achievements, including printed documents, there is no doubt about the fact that paper books will probably become a thing of the past in the future. I personally agree with this statement and believe that this process is unpreventable mainly as a direct result of the cutting-edge technology, preservation of our planet, and the broadcasting speed of these gadgets.
Firstly, the inexorable march of new beneficial and modern technology will probably eliminate the usage of paper for propagating information in the near future. It is worth noting that high-tech devices with large memories can store and transfer thousands of millions of information in a few seconds, so it would be fruitful to use these tiny devices in order to obtain and have the latest data in different areas of specialization, including scientific discoveries, space explorations, medical and engineering practices. For example, one of the most vital and efficient gadgets widely being used by the public is the mobile phone; as a result of using it a user can have access to a large number of data without any troubles. Thereby reading printed newspapers would be like living with dinosaurs.
Apart from the previous point, the increase of carbon dioxide emission and clearing of trees are two concerning controversial issues which deter people from reading printed media in the coming years. It is noteworthy that most of the eminent and leading scientists have been working on projects in order to stabilize the increasing temperature of the Earth mainly as a consequence of cutting down trees and carbon dioxide emission emerging from the exhaust of factories, including paper and carton factories. Many environmental groups and governmental bodies have been doing their best to stop emitting carbon dioxide during the last decade. As a consequence, it is highly likely that nobody read paper books over the course of the next decades.
On the other hand, while some individuals state that books and printed newspapers are practical whenever the power is gone in different areas including megacities, these printed materials are not as fast as modern devices to inform the public. That is to say, the term Global Village has been established among different nations for the reason that people are able to hear the latest news in the blink of an eye about an event such as a human-error accident or natural disaster happening even in far-flung places by means of using social media including, Twitter, Instagram, Reddit, Telegram, to name just a few. Take the Covid19 pandemic as a clear example; the news about this mortal phenomenon was forecasted all over the world and people became aware of it immediately in 2019. A simple comparison with previous deadly illnesses sheds light on the effectiveness of online information propagation in our era.
In conclusion, it is agreed that high-tech devices will possibly be preferred over dated printed books and papers in the coming years mostly because they are more effective and rapid. Besides we should not forget that our planet is in dire need of protection against environmental issues such as greenhouse gases and global warming as well. If we make the switch, the next generations may enjoy a healthier Earth in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 682, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...t of using it a user can have access to a large number of data without any troubles. Thereby read...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Besides,
...ause they are more effective and rapid. Besides we should not forget that our planet is...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, if, may, second, so, well, while, apart from, as for, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 41.998997996 183% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2772.0 1615.20841683 172% => OK
No of words: 538.0 315.596192385 170% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15241635688 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81610080973 4.20363070211 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84753996492 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 298.0 176.041082164 169% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553903345725 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 877.5 506.74238477 173% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.1475471335 49.4020404114 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.058823529 106.682146367 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6470588235 20.7667163134 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1176470588 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189489658473 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578019648761 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574299259201 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0978636380921 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319156681309 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 152.0 78.4519038076 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.