Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Although many people state that sharing information freely in different categories is absolutely beneficial, others believe that it is extremely perilous mainly because of some reasons, which with the benefit of hindsight, I agree with them.
The belief of the first party is to share the latest data with the rest of the world without any limitations and charges. In this context, it is worth noting that the latest information, such as those related to scientific findings, cutting edge devices and state-of-the-art technologies can be distributed between different nations all around the world and become pervasive. Also noteworthy is the fact that in this situation, those talented and genius individuals and companies, mostly in third-world countries, deprived of the latest achievements, cannot use this practical information in order to invent new gadgets in different scientific areas such as pharmaceutical companies and their productions. Thus, sharing the information freely is highly advantageous.
The second party contends that providing data without any restrictions would probably lead to national anarchy. It means, most leading organizations across the world have been working on their projects either in different sites or laboratories and also are investing prodigious amounts of money on them; propagating their findings could possibly result in bankruptcy and economic recession for these structures in the near future. Apart from that, it is feasible that sharing these vital pieces of information, especially those associated with weaponry, cause the third Word War as these achievements could be used by wrong people such as terrorists. Thereby, distributing this kind of information would not be practicable.
While both groups are right to some extent, I personally vote for not sharing novel information freely. We may probably destroy the competition between big companies such as Google, Microsoft, Pixar and those that are active in other important sections such as the oil and automobile industry, to name just a few. Imagine that Mercedes Benz would share its brand new gearbox with other rivals. That is to say, other organizations could possibly copy this prominent invention and left the inventor with no money at the end, so propagating unlimited information would be absolutely deleterious.
In conclusion, despite many pros of giving information to others without any charges, I strongly believe that it will have long-term repercussions including international chaos and stagnation, after all.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... around the world and become pervasive. Also noteworthy is the fact that in this sit...
^^^^
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this talented' or ''?
Suggestion: this talented;
...thy is the fact that in this situation, those talented and genius individuals and companies, m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...ney on them; propagating their findings could possibly result in bankruptcy and economic reces...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 431, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...ls. That is to say, other organizations could possibly copy this prominent invention and left ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, third, thus, while, after all, apart from, in conclusion, kind of, such as, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2164.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63541666667 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06568269285 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588541666667 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.1663081086 49.4020404114 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.571428571 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4285714286 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267264033206 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945685741586 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061580605389 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148083094205 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372420958008 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... around the world and become pervasive. Also noteworthy is the fact that in this sit...
^^^^
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this talented' or ''?
Suggestion: this talented;
...thy is the fact that in this situation, those talented and genius individuals and companies, m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...ney on them; propagating their findings could possibly result in bankruptcy and economic reces...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 431, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...ls. That is to say, other organizations could possibly copy this prominent invention and left ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, third, thus, while, after all, apart from, in conclusion, kind of, such as, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2164.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63541666667 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06568269285 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588541666667 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.1663081086 49.4020404114 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.571428571 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4285714286 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267264033206 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945685741586 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061580605389 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148083094205 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372420958008 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.