In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The writer of the issue is of the view that making a great breakthrough in any field of attempt is beyond the bounds of possibility unless one is influenced by previous achievements in that specific field. However, while making a remarkable success in some very rare occasions is feasible with the help of past achievements, I strongly believe that it is viable to make mesmerizing breakthroughs without first being influenced by past achievements.
It is certain that human beings have discovered many new topics without being strongly affected by previous breakthroughs. In this respect, we can think of some beneficial and significant inventions such as Electricity; it is worth noting that Thomas Edison was not affected by previous achievements in that interval. On top of that, there were many incomplete projects left mostly because they seemed impossible to become complete, but they would be done by those who were even discouraged by previous failures and disappointments. Hence, it is implausible to ascribe new achievements mainly to those affected by previous breakthroughs.
Furthermore, most individuals who have accomplished in their areas had brand-new ideas rather than just influencing by previous achievements. It means they act mainly in order to ameliorate either their society or their personal lives. In terms of Politics, for instance, take Abraham Lincoln as a vivid example who did his best in order to abolish slavery in an aggressive social environment which had never observed such a consequential movement before. Moreover, there are many pioneers who are doing their best to facilitate the daily life by means of novel technologies; production of an unprecedented social medium such as Facebook illustrates the point.
However, as it is mentioned in the introductory paragraph, there are some scarce occasions in which many people succeed in making great contributions with first being influenced by previous achievements. In this context, these people may be motivated or stimulated by observing past breakthroughs, doing their best to obtain better results. Instagram and Twitter, for example, are widely-used and successful media which are just promoted versions of Facebook, trying to increase their share of users.
In conclusion, I hold the belief that making significant contributions without being influenced by previous achievements is not impossible in any field. Not only were many explorations done by those who were not influenced by previous breakthroughs, but these individuals had also new ideas, leading to unprecedented accomplishments. If one limits herself to previous experiences in order to become successful, she would never virtually thrive in her life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2304.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 417.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52517985612 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26238699699 2.79657885939 117% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52757793765 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 703.8 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9785103772 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.0 118.986275619 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0625 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 5.21951772744 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219364916302 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787965349897 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0947857531276 0.0758088955206 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13476226381 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774975416791 0.0667264976115 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.