The gap between the rich and the poor people is increasingly widespread, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause? What are the solutions to address the problem.

In today’s rapidly changing globalized world, the problem of indigence has become one of the most pressing questions, requiring immediate attention. These days there is a huge gap between indigent and wealthy people and this situation is growing worse. This essay will discuss what reasons might lead to such issues and what we can do to ameliorate them.
It is likely that one of the main causes behind the issue is growing unemployment in some parts of the world. For instance, almost 900 million people in Asia are living below the poverty line and the percentage of unemployed people there is the highest in the world as well. In addition, serious overcrowding is often cited as a major cause at this problem. It is evident, that the higher the population is, the more resources they consume. This in turn leads to a shortage of essential goods and,consequently, poverty. For instance, in Africa, families tend to have many children and it is common that parents are simply not able to maintain such a large family. As a result, all members live in very poor conditions. In short, unemployment and overpopulation, nowadays, might be a cause of rising poverty that leads to growing a difference between rich and poor social layers.
While the problems may seem intractable, there are solutions available. The first one is better support from the government. It is true, that only the authorities are capable of adjusting the level of poverty and to limit exorbitant amount of money which are owned by businessmen and entrepreneurs. For example, in Russia’s parliament a legislative proposal was offered which claimed to give jobs to young specialists, even if they do not have any experience. Another option would be to impose taxes for second and more children as Japanese people have implemented. This measure can stop overpopulation and partially resolve the problem with poverty.
To sum up, this essay discussed what we can do to combat the huge gap between poor and rich people.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 497, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , consequently
...ads to a shortage of essential goods and,consequently, poverty. For instance, in Africa, fami...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, may, second, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in short, as a result, it is true, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02710843373 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89940422399 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584337349398 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5965600079 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7222222222 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72222222222 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318570001487 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797928294719 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718088364433 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18884289336 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571457405082 0.056905535591 100% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.