Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatres, is a waste of
money. Government must invest this money in public services instead.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that the authorities should aid in the arts while others
are convinced in funding on the public sector. Finding a balance between these
paths of donating is a question for government to tackle.
Supporting arts is not a waste of taxpayers` money as some people argue.
Entertainment has always been daily for people all over the world. Working five
days a week, having a side responsibilities, caring about people all these factors
can be underestimated. Visiting theatres or museums, a jazz concert could be a sip
of fresh air from daily routine. If the authorities had not aided some funds in the
arts, the planet would not have ever known about Michael Jackson. This is why
people should understand at the government because one of their duty is to provide
some sort of pleasure to us.
Public services have always been requiring aid from the government.
Despite of any attempts there is a group of people who do not care about being
entertained because they spend their lives in shelters. The government has always
been attempting to support this sector but the reality is often disappointing. If the
government had funded in shelters at Skid Row, these attempts would not have
minimized the number of homeless people. Because of those who do not desire to
change anything even with aid from the authorities. In other words, donations
should be calculated and not be overestimated in terms of priority choice.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the best solution is to find and keep the
balance of assistance for social aspects under the government`s control.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 28, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'responsibility'?
Suggestion: responsibility
...orking five days a week, having a side responsibilities, caring about people all these factors ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 42, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...inimized the number of homeless people. Because of those who do not desire to change a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, in conclusion, sort of, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14606741573 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93041424345 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588014981273 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.4549711364 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.6 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86666666667 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 21.0 4.38176352705 479% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132008194528 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464468955688 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407256987956 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0375108412393 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368805760638 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.