One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. Do you think advantages of this outweigh disadvantages?
Healthcare system has always been highly debatable in all the societies. The development of technologies has aided Medicine to step forward and allow people to exist longer. Although medical care provides to people more abilities for their lives, I strongly believe that these developments can cause crucial consequences.
On the one hand, medical insurance aids to people solve a huge number of diseases. It means that these type of development is considered as a method to prolong life. For instance, the Social Psychological University of Saint-Petersburg has proven that 65 percent of people prefer life span instead of living in abundance of resources, which increase the level of life. Therefore, contemporary technologies of medicine can overcome such urgent problems as cancer, aging and other illnesses. In other words, medical care aspires to extend life and supply to everybody more time for opportunities.
On the other hand, I am sure that life expectancy may damage our planet. Proceeding from that the resources of the Earth are limited, but they are essential for everybody. For example, according to the research of Green Peace organization in 2005, living creatures have started suffer from the overpopulation from last several years. Hence, starvation is regarded as a majority issue of population pressure, which create limitation of abundance of resources like water, crops, places for living and other. Thus, the result of immortality just provides suffering from people.
Ttaking everything into consideration it can be concluded that the phenomena of improving of medical care has advantages and disadvantages, which were stated above. However, from my perspective it’s clear that disadvantage prevails over positive opinion.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57835820896 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04984533751 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641791044776 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2808268651 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215304046979 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601241013826 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050068208367 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118720290606 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483649785006 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.