The government's investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Over the years mankind has recognised the need for improving life in all its areas, which has led to a search for a balance in investing in the good. In this regard some people believe that the development of art is money down the drain and it should be spent on improving life support systems. Although investment in infrastructure and public goods is vital, sponsoring creative sector is important as a foundation for the development of human culture.
On the one hand, a satisfactory and well-organized supply net improves the quality of bipedal life at times. Most people would agree that the good grade of urban systems and the corresponding simplification of life permit focusing on other important matters. Otherwise, a constant return to solving everyday issues lead to stagnation in all other spheres of the individuals and, accordingly, of humanity. Even «New Your Times» says that reducing the energy and time costs of each individual to solve everyday problems in the short-term will advance an upsurge in various humanity areas. Thus, investment in infrastructure will not only improve the lives of every person, but it will also lead to development in other areas.
On the other hand, a civilized, society brings order to people's heads and assumes to save money on the systems that protect a person from themselves. Individuals with unstructured and selfish ideas about life and culture bring ruin to public that has to be constantly corrected. Therefore, treating the "disease", not the "symptoms" leads to lowering social expenses, eventually extricating funds that can be directed to more useful things. According to “Forbes” magazine, providing community with cultural goods such as theatre, music and creative activities teaches society responsible behaviour resulting in the 27 %- governmental cost reduction. Hence, the sponsorship of the arts creates a healthy society that, in its own responsibility, will release capitals for the development of other areas.
To sum up, it is clear that the government should accumulate its funds in order to direct the staffing of services and institutions that promote the culture of society. As a result, a balanced approach to the distribution of the budget will lead to the development of all areas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
Over the years mankind has recognised the need for imp...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, such as, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1935.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3305785124 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20326725148 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570247933884 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.3885497054 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 129.0 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129868252156 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0407344100375 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397879148783 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0814748902851 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360158975116 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.