Nowadays, the number of people who suffer from respiratory diseases such as lungs cancer and pneumonia are increasing at an alarming rate, and smoking is one of the main reasons which leads to this issue. Smoking in public places has been banned by some governments, even this has affected the freedom of living people. However, I completely agree with this point of view and I will give the reason why in this essay.
Let us start by looking at why smoking in public is such a bad thing for many people. First of all, inhaling a great amount of smoke can bring about the harmful effect not only on smokers but also the non-smokers. As we have known, children's respiratory system is not as good as those of adults, so they are the one who most likely to be affected by the smoke. For example, a man is enjoying his cigarette while he is waiting at the train station, the dispersion of smoke can be inhaled by the babies and their mothers sitting next to him. Furthermore, it is regarded as the responsibilities of the grown-ups for smoking in front of a lot of people including children and teenagers, as this unintentional advertisement will strongly affect children's actions in their later life. Obviously, they tend to mimic what their parents were doing.
On the other side, while smoking or not lies on each personal willingness, it can be seen as selfish and unfair for those who smoke cigarettes for recreational activities. Some may argue that it is basically the same as the notion of wearing perfumes and colognes in public. As the fragrances are also dispersed to around area, affecting surrounding people to a certain level. However, the effect is not so detrimental to the public, whereas smoke and ashes can gradually damage people's health.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that whether to smoke or not depends on people's own choice. But, since cigarettes can only bring about more harm than good overall, publicly smoking should be managed through the way the government establishing preferential policies to restrict the amount of smoke being dumped into the atmosphere.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...s for recreational activities. Some may argue that it is basically the same as the no...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87114845938 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75038934387 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577030812325 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9721739006 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.933333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252539684567 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814607026559 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490148125978 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157022028307 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451714334285 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.