It is widely believed that men and women are considered being professional in their own separated terms and also show some weaknesses in different fields. Some may argue that it is feasible to exclude males or females from doing certain types of jobs regarding their gender and personally, I think it might be appropriate to do so.
By looking at the typically maternal types of job such as nursery, pre-school education, women predominated men in the natural ability to take care of young children. Lower or more fundamental level of institutions may recruit more female, less male as woman often show more vulnerable, gentle and natural caring traits than men. These characteristics are considered ideally for jobs related to children and younger adults.
Women also show a more feminine side when they have a smaller body figures than the other gender. This is particularly good for artistic fields such as art, hand made product making or culinary industry. It is true that nowadays, number of male artists are increasing but it is undeniable that women show more advantageous sides than men.
In contrast, men have more difficulties showing vulnerability and they are seen as more aggressiveness then women. These are commonly considered as masculine traits and it is especially suitable in competitive business environment such as: for-ex trading, real estate or banking and finance. In this case, women tend to have a lower chance in getting into these one sided organization or female leader may have less opportunity to be promoted to a more superior position.
It is true that women are now developing more masculine traits and men have shown more of the feminine side which helps both gender with their jobs and the career they are choosing. In general, I think it is more feasible for any organisation to choose who is the best to do the jobs in order to promote wealth and organisation's development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...eaknesses in different fields. Some may argue that it is feasible to exclude males or...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...nd they are seen as more aggressiveness then women. These are commonly considered as...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, regarding, so, then, i think, in contrast, in general, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0786163522 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85002309124 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562893081761 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6977217183 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.230769231 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4615384615 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216695199283 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786203780109 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601023826363 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126122766404 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597346055898 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.