Conclusively, science is, an imperative developer to the thriving of a state. There is, accordingly, a motion that goverment should allotacate handsome of capital income relating science knowledge insight raher than evolving one. Albeit, this avenue seems logical, I intend to swallow that investment in other subjects is vitally equivalent.
Human life has whereby been envolved positively with regard to the profoundly growth of both science and technology. On a personal rank, appliance invention, for illustration, smartphone helps people neccesity of communication to become efficiently and effectively. Additionally, sciene also contribute to help to soar the productivity of the whole society, which can be seen the salient evidence in affluent countries such as the US and Japan. However, this not imply that science is the first and foremost factor that uplift urban capital. In other words, the richness of wealth society derives from other dependence conjunctions. Whereby, furthermore, in order that a country can be flourished, each folk requires a great-pedagogical education, not scarcely courses about science. Arts, sophisticated work, poem as well as notably minute skills are less pivotal, all of which escalate immensely to condition senses of intellectual and highly cunning fellows – the burning burst of a magnificent society.
Apart from this, if the authorities fund intesify science sector, this may lead to the force trend that learners deem this knowledge is pointless and dismissal. Their awarness about the globe outside is not developed utterly as a result. Moreover, when practicing and learning science is highy applauded, the role of non-science academician may not be conscious. Admittedly, often not only pupils but also parents are more likely to display a disrespectful attitude toward such teachers.
To summarize, I accept that either science or technology comprehensively benefits on society even multiple levels, other subjects posses their place to shaping a better world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to soar' or 'soar'.
Suggestion: to soar; soar
...ionally, sciene also contribute to help soaring the productivity of the whole society, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[4]
Message: Did you mean 'can be' or 'has been'?
Suggestion: can be; has been
...roductivity of the whole society, which can been seen the salient evidence in affluent c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 986, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... cunning fellows – the burning burst of an magnificent society. Apart from th...
^^
Line 3, column 1010, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urning burst of an magnificent society. Apart from this, if the authorities fund...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, apart from, such as, as a result, as well as, in other words, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70297029703 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09279137933 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.696369636964 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4192473403 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.2 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5333333333 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168833485339 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490731583527 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0295129823345 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975621399934 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368199860567 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.