Transportation is one of the key sectors that governments have been concentrating on. The idea that railways should be invested instead of roads is widely supported. From my perspective, I largely agree with this viewpoint, but also believe there may have other side effects as well.
There are no rooms for doubts that enhacing railways brings benefits in different ways. First of all, trains plays an integral role in shipping cargo in this burgeoning world. As the demand of transportation in term of intercity and international trade due to opening economy, train is the favoured option with economical fuel yet massive amount of freight. Moreover, passenger trains are also highly recommended. With cutting-edge railways, geographical features like rough mountains are no longer obstacles. For examples, express trains can now go through mountains or go underwater while passengers are able to feel relaxing, comfortable and safe. Furthermore, this can be the springboard to push up and diversify tourism if railroads are invested thoroughly. That trains are not, however, flexible is the reason why some people unprefer trains.
On the other hand, improving roads should be taken into consideration due to its merits. Obviously, people feel more independent and flexible when using their own vehicles. In other words, better roads accompaning with suitable logistics can meet travellers' demands. In addition, although trains have advantages in shipping cargo among countries or cities, people prefer using trucks and lorries to customers' places or warehouses in inner city due to its door-to-door services. In fact, it is crucial to develop logistics to avoid traffic jams especially in peak hours, which is the worldwide unsolvable issue. Therefore, governments should not neglect developing roads.
In conclusions, railways and roads are both important in their own ways and should be invested harmonizedly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 479, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... city due to its door-to-door services. In fact, it is crucial to develop logistic...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, first of all, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54761904762 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99403397397 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65306122449 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5137862121 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6111111111 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2222222222 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130256604902 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413303612324 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454786790393 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0849969009099 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331249987184 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.