The belief is that it is savage and insecure to use animals as samples in human medical experiments. Other advocates, whereas, assert that it is vital for human sake. I largely support the latter viewpoint.
Tests on animals, on the one hand, benefit human life. First of all, animals can help scientists re-examine their scientific theories of medication. Apparently, few animals, warm blooded species as well as human, have certain biological features in common. Thereby, scientists can experience how some substances or chemical components affect animals. In other words, if failures or mistakes happen, no human life will cost. Moreover, animals used for medical tests are decided by WHO, World Health Organisation. White mice or rabbits are popular and efficient species due to its short lifecircle and fast precreation. In fact, people dare not try new drugs or medications that have been not tested on animals. That is why sacrificing some of them for noble duty is not a big deal. Therefore, vital medical inventions outweighs.
On the other hand, we also need to dissect the phenomenon under a different angle. Like human, animals are supposed to have rights to live and enjoy their lives as living creatures, thus we should not deprive their rights to foster our own lives. Furthermore, vegetarians and PETA claim that cutting-edge technology has massively contributed to medical field, thus scientists can facsimile the experienments on computers with virtual samples instead of real ones. Finally, what about side effect going beyond lifecircle of animals but within human expectancy?
In conclusions, either side has its own excuses while I personally perfer the test on animals due to its efficiency in medical progress.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: Whom
...s used for medical tests are decided by WHO, World Health Organisation. White mice ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, first of all, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31884057971 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8188498938 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648550724638 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3273591859 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5555555556 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3333333333 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213328232594 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630142987419 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454472128877 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128865820976 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311357660108 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.98 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.