Fast-paced changing economy leads to that people around the world can purchase the same product no matter where they are. From my perspective, this phenomenon has brought a number of merits while some drawbacks are hidden.
There are no rooms for doubts that this kind of trade benefits both buyers and salers. First and foremost is that as the increase in international chains of shops, or franchises, together with supermarkets, they can fulfill customer's demands and gain more profits as a result. Meanwhile, it is inevitable that buyers have no obstacle to approach oversea products and expand their choices. Another point worth mentioning is that online trading is essential in this burgeoning and busy society. In fact, more and more people have less spare time to go shopping due to the huge amount of work. Thus, the most convenient way for them to purchase stuff is via Internet. In other words, just with a click people and online payment people can have their things at home right away, and this help them save a lot of precious time. Therefore, this development is truely an optimistic phenomenon.
On the other hand, we should disset this new kind of trading under a different angle. That the advent of international products can bring an end to domestic products should not be overlooked. For examples, in Vietnam, it becomes easier to purchase Dutch milk, which is globally eminent, so what will happen to the milk in host country with unpopular brands? Moreover, that people only use international products has become trendy and put the culture identity on the edge of disappearance due to over-assimilation. Sooner ot later, it is predicted that domestic industries will collapse. That is why this development can pose a threat to the national economy.
In conclusions, this phenomenon has its own pros and cons, but we need to harmonize its level.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 492, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dentity on the edge of disappearance due to over-assimilation. Sooner ot later, i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02893890675 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78429856955 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617363344051 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9181114014 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2941176471 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94117647059 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204646071986 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563802514859 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039494418788 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103684718823 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450882898138 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.