Online education, is widely believed, can bring remarkable efficiency and convenience to learners. Whereas, some people claim that conventional education is more advantageous. Im my opinion, I completely support both views.
There are no rooms for doubts that learning through Internet benefits learners massively. First and foremost is that online learning can provide flexibility. In other words, there are no fixed schedule, and students are more likely to manage or decide on their own studying time. Besides, a number of materials like function downloads and replays are available if learners neither understand nor catch up with the lessons. However this method still has some hidden drawbacks. Not all of the students after watching online lectures, reading electronic documents or materials can absorb information and, as the result, they are left with unanswered questions due to lack of contact to ask. Futhermore, the method also requires facilities and severely high discipline as well as self-learning skills.
On the other hand, face-to-face learning with teachers at school shows several fair aspects. In fact, at school, students will get nummerous oppotunities to receive wise advices from many different professors, who are aficionados and devoted guides. When learning in class, yet students can be distracted by many factors around such as noise from classmates. Thus, students hardly cconcentrate on the lesson thoroughly. In addition, whilst studying in a crowded class, it is difficult or even impossible to catch teacher's attention. That is why sometimes learners' problems are unsolved.
In conclusions, both methods have its own pros and cons. From my perspective, it is important to choose which would suit us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...efficiency and convenience to learners. Whereas, some people claim that conventional ed...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...ntional education is more advantageous. Im my opinion, I completely support both v...
^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...derstand nor catch up with the lessons. However this method still has some hidden drawb...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...od still has some hidden drawbacks. Not all of the students after watching online lectures...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...potunities to receive wise advices from many different professors, who are aficionados and dev...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...advices from many different professors, who are aficionados and devoted guides. When le...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, so, still, thus, well, whereas, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56390977444 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93565456512 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.695488721805 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.73993558 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2222222222 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7777777778 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211620239767 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565353160918 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536594070385 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10532222391 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409829422156 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.