Overseas tourists, is still believed, bring terrible impacts to the countries they come. And this is not, in most cases, entirely true. In this essay, a comparison between pros and cons brought about by foreign visitors will be discussed.
It is obvious that the economy of the host countries can gain benefits from foreign tourists. To satisfy the requirements or demands of visitors, a series of service industries spring up sooner or later. For example, amenities like restaurants, theaters or entertainment centers have been built which makes significant contributions to the growth of the local economy. Furthermore, the appearance of this new kind of industry has helped solve the unemployment problems by providing plenty of jobs like delivering seawater to seafood restaurants. Not only that but also the relationships among countries are positively influenced. In fact, by showing enthusiasm and respects to the guests, the goverment has succeeded in enhancing and tightening the international cooperations between them. However, host countries could be considered to be disrespectful to the people if they showed discriminations or humiliated the visitors.
On the other hand, some hidden drawbacks are inevitable. When there are more and more visitors coming, countries, specifically ones with developing tourist industries, have to be faced to controlling pollution problems. A lot of unconscious visitors have littered recklessly, resulting to certain alarming levels. Besides, conservation areas like primary or intact forests are now being threated. As tourism flourishes, a number of animals and plants are on the brink of extinction because tourists are destroying and contaminating their habitats. Therefore, bio-diversity should be taken into consideration immediately.
In conclusion, overseas tourists bring more benefits, despite their unavoidable bad effects. From my perspective, the goverment should legislate for a sustainable development.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, as to, for example, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, in most cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.85763888889 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29416915833 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677083333333 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5781634005 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7222222222 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106085779025 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.028101600636 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337819548056 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0543605437828 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031122860595 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.41 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.63 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.