Starving is now a worldwide issue whereas a lot of money are spent only for pets. This phenomenon has brought a serious debate. In my opinion, I largely support raising pets.
There are no rooms for doubts that spending money for pets is not wasteful. First of all, raising pet is a way to release stress. In fact, some scientific researchs show that cats or dogs can reduce the severely stressful environment so that owners can get rid of stress. Also by looking at the pets' adorable faces, we can keep calm and reduce the rate of heart attack. Furthermore, pets can help us do things. Just with a little training, pets can be useful in our daily life. For examples, dogs guard our house at night or when we are absense, cats keep the mice away from the kitchen. Therefore, raising pets is really a wise investment.
However, we need to scrutinize the phenomenon under different angle. In term of humanity, we should put our humanity into priority. In the other words, money should be used to help ohter people with poor conditions or unlucky backgrounds. Because it is the way human does, we help each other. In addition, it is risky to raise pets due to lack of medication for them. Even though, it, in medication field, has reached significant achievements, they are only for human. Meanwhile, pets have some undetectable diseases and some can effect human. That is why we should take these into considerations.
In conclusions, having a pet can enhance our lives in distinct ways, but we should not invest big into this field.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...t so that owners can get rid of stress. Also by looking at the pets adorable faces, ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, really, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72862453532 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61972874099 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617100371747 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8169256254 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 63.6 106.682146367 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.45 20.7667163134 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0935215476068 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0304653619158 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428420112547 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0579196731794 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402320656682 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 13.0946893788 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 50.2224549098 150% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 11.3001002004 53% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.56 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.