While some museums are totally fee-free for visitors, others require admission fee. This phenomenon does not entirely bring merits, several drawbacks are hidden behind.
On the one hand, there are no rooms for doubts that charging visitors is irrational. Firstly, museums, like other historical sites, are public educational places which are supposed to be openly available for everyone. For local citizens, it seems unplausible to pay money to study about their historical background. Thus, people cannot show their nostalgia or appreciate the precious peace in which they are living, due to lack of historical knowledge. Furthermore, this could be an obstackle for globalization. Apparently, tourism is truely an efficient way to exchange culture among countries, and museums play an integral role. That is why admission fee can be regarded as an invisible barrier.
However, on the other hand, we need to scrutinize the phenomenon at an opposite angle. If museums are non-profit organizations, who will pay for maintainance and development? It is inevitable that money from donations or sponsors are not enough to restore or even redecorate the buildings and facilities. Moreover, when visitors pay for admission tickets, there will surely staff with professionals whose job is to guide visitors. Therefore, this can enhance the quality of the trip.
In conclusions, charging visitors should not be prohibited but the fee should be affordable.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1233.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 223.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52914798206 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00643133485 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.663677130045 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.1239779173 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.2 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8666666667 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225536600006 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702766647797 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641729153867 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12822487298 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053211341147 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.2 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.