It is often considered that the government should invest a large number on money on the construction of railways and spend less on roadways. I strongly agree with this statement because travelling by trains is more convenient and less production of emission than by motors.
Travelling by locomotive vehicles can take passengers to their destination faster due to the trains do not need to get in terrible traffics like automotive does; moreover, the less time people spend in commuting, the more time they can use to work. For example, most people in Bangkok must lose over 2 hours of their working time for getting to workplace, later on, after the Thai government has introduced railways transportation in there, Thai people can use them to travel across Bangkok faster and easier.
In term of environmental aspects, automotive vehicles, which mainly consume fossil fuel, produced plenty of emission that affect to health of people there. Even though there are less emission produced by one car compared to one train, but more than hundred passengers can travel together in a one route while car is mostly available for 3-4 persons. For instance, in Bangkok, there is a campaign about encouraging people not to travel by private vehicles and to use public transportation especially by trains that aims to reduce the pollution generated by the combustion engine; therefore, this campaign will lead the environment of Bangkok to be better.
In summary, there are many advantages that governments should split their money to construct public transportation system particularly in railways which can decrease commuting time and also keep environment in good condition.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...ar compared to one train, but more than hundred passengers can travel together in a one...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28838951311 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88878422094 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573033707865 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.3490306261 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 176.5 106.682146367 165% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.375 20.7667163134 161% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130860114059 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681526596038 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072048019295 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102258138392 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744451383922 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 13.0946893788 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.