Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
There are a lot of problems associated with rising number of vehicles on the roads. Hence, many believe that public officials should invest more budget in building an effective railway system rather than making more roads. In my opinion, this is a proactive move that can help nations in the long term.
First, building more rails will allow the possibility of making trains as our primary mode of transport. Trains, compared to other public transport vehicles, are much faster and able to bring a large number of people to various destinations. Second, they can also be used to deliver consumer products more effectively especially those that are time sensitive to some foods and produce. Lastly, they are more environmentally friendly because they leave fewer carbon footprints than cars.
On the other hand, building fewer roads spare lands, trees and forests that are often sacrificed to make way in constructing highways and streets. Thus, lands can then be converted and use for other means, like building more farms or allotting more space for residential and commercial use. Also, this may limit the rising number of cars on the roads which have been proven to contribute to the worsening problem of climate change. Lastly, building roads are expensive, thus government can save more money by investing more in railways.
In summary, building more railways offers a viable solution to problems brought about by proliferating vehicles on the roads. It is a much faster, more effective and environmentally friendly means of transporting people and goods. Thus, politicians should consider the possibility of investing more money in developing our railway system and promoting it as a primary mode of transport.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...cles, are much faster and able to bring a large number of people to various destinations. Second,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, lastly, may, second, so, then, thus, in summary, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26811594203 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74641505078 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.1327113086 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.857142857 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106057636959 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041225834663 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458492885539 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0805509684766 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626556399468 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.