In this new era of civilization, governments of some countries prefer to contribute million of dollars every year on their space schemes. Also, nowadays Mars is the concentration of scientists' reference. However, some people do believe that it would be better to spend this amount of cash on solving with problems nearer to home. From my point of view, I definetly agree with the latest statement that government shoul give more money to the closest problems rather than spending million dollars to the space.
In the first place, there are many advantages of spending money to the problems in our Earth. One of this that government should provide with the cheapest accommodation to the poverty families and create new jobs to them to their further living. Secondly, the government should establish more schools and educate poor families children with the high-quality apprenticeship. In the future they will be helpful and useful person to the public and government. For example , in my country our president do not spend money to observing space, instead of this, our government contribute billion dollars every year to provide foods and work to the poverty people and in addition to this, they are guaranteed to have cheapest home to their further life.
In the second place, it also beneficial if government donate more money to the space schedules. Firstly, it will be created a new type of travelling called space travel. If the government organize this form of travel, they will gain twice or more profit from this. And it will also useful to the local community such as poorer families. Secondly, scientists discovered that in Mars, there are twice or more mineral products than in our planet. But it is very challenging to obtain this products and to transport to our planet.
To sum up, there are many profits from this claims but the real benefit will receive if states contribute million of dollars to improve poorer societies and i agree with this statement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... of some countries prefer to contribute million of dollars every year on their space sc...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 481, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...e closest problems rather than spending million dollars to the space. In the first p...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...o the public and government. For example , in my country our president do not spen...
^^
Line 3, column 582, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...tead of this, our government contribute billion dollars every year to provide foods and...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 705, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the cheapest'.
Suggestion: have the cheapest
...ddition to this, they are guaranteed to have cheapest home to their further life. In the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 482, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...t. But it is very challenging to obtain this products and to transport to our planet...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oducts and to transport to our planet. To sum up, there are many profits from t...
^^^
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... To sum up, there are many profits from this claims but the real benefit will receiv...
^^^^
Line 7, column 107, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...nefit will receive if states contribute million of dollars to improve poorer societies ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 158, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...dollars to improve poorer societies and i agree with this statement.
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in addition, such as, to sum up, in the first place, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01823708207 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66664772721 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507598784195 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8653165546 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.1875 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1875 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.01903807615 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338884775582 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105840965367 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830673854307 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216263170474 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130407070118 0.056905535591 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.