Governments alone cannot be expected to solve environmental problems. It is also the responsibility of businesses and individuals to help. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Environmental problems have been a critical concern since the Industrial Revolution, when humans started taking advantage of the nature. Hence, people have begun arguing about who must be responsible for the crisis. Some believe that governments should be the one to tackle this issue alone; however, in my opinion, this matter needs effort not only from the governments but also from businesses and individuals due to the following reasons.
First and foremost, the cost to solve these problems is ineffable because this is a long-term process. It means that governments alone are not able to afford this financial burden due to the fact that businesses contribute to the pollution process by emitting gases from factories or individuals who are not aware of how adversely their littering actions would impact the environment. Thus, joint contributions from both individuals and businesses are necessary in the cost of solving the problems.
Furthermore, there are actions and efforts that governments cannot carry out by themselves. Take the said action of littering above as an example, even if the governments establish tons of campaigns about protecting the nature or introduce taxes; however, without contribution and responsibility from citizens, the problems would never be lessened or changed. In addition to that, if businesses do not realize the consequences of their actions, governments’ regulations about waste management are nothing.
Admittedly, people may argue that taxes are the money that they pay for the governments who must be in charge of using it effectively to work out the solutions. However, if all parties are not on the same page, then the attempt on solving this crisis would not be effective.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that businesses and individuals must join with the governments into tackling environmental problems so that the process would be more productive.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, then, thus, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43624161074 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03273285709 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580536912752 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.9504084326 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279496500064 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988394983662 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036666118359 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154488431361 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353906208234 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.