Governments should spend money on railways rather than
roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The problem that whether government should invest more money on railways or roads is a controversal one. In my opinion, the investment should be spent on railways.
There are some explanations for this reason. Firstly, constructing more railways aids citizens financially.There are, in fact, many people who are struggling with earning a living and having difficulties in finance.Therefore, they surely have to be economic. if they buy tickets and enjoy the public transportation, they will not have to spend a huge amount of expenditure on purchasing a private one, such as cars or motorbikes.this is a very economic way for inhabitants to save their money.
Secondly, government encourages citizens to conserve the environment by buiding more railways railways rather than roads. According to scientific database, the amount of carbon dioxide has been increasing by 0.2% each year, which causes the greehouse effect and global warming. one of the main reason for this issue is the over disposal of this kind of gas from private transportation. As long as more railways being constructed, more people tend to travel by public transportation, which decreases the amount of emitted greenhose effect gas.
Finally, since government decides to invest money on railways, people inevitably spend more time on travelling by trains, which helps them to save time.if citizens drive cars to working places, they usually get in stuck because the time they are driving is rush hours.this, however, probably not happens if they use trains instead of private vehicles, whose has exactly time schedule for all of the routes. As the result, inhabitants can comfortably sit in the train and enjoy the views outside.
In conclusion, it is explanatory if government choose to spend expenditure on constructing railways since it encourage people to protect environment, save money and time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...more railways aids citizens financially.There are, in fact, many people who are strug...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...ving and having difficulties in finance.Therefore, they surely have to be economic. if th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...efore, they surely have to be economic. if they buy tickets and enjoy the public t...
^^
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: ECONOMIC_ECONOMICAL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economical' (=affordable, cheap)?
Suggestion: economical
...ch as cars or motorbikes.this is a very economic way for inhabitants to save their money...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: railways
...onserve the environment by buiding more railways railways rather than roads. According to scienti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...he greehouse effect and global warming. one of the main reason for this issue is th...
^^^
Line 5, column 457, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... constructed, more people tend to travel by public transportation, which decrease...
^^
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vitably spend more time on travelling by trains, which helps them to save time.if...
^^
Line 7, column 390, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...es, whose has exactly time schedule for all of the routes. As the result, inhabitants can ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39322033898 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13938570467 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589830508475 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 93.8161618391 49.4020404114 190% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.583333333 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168147899129 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068495362084 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539139358383 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106405631225 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353138696653 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.