Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads to what extent do you agree or disadree?
Many people opine that it is necessary for governmental participants to invest money in railways more than roads. Even though, it seems beneficial to have both railways and street roads in a high standard, railways should take the priority over roads since train transportation presumed to be quicker and more convenient. I agree to this point of view to a great extent. Additionally, this essay will elaborate on why railways need to be taken into consideration more.
First, speed is one of the most significant factors people always Consider as they want to decide what transportation choose for their travels. in contemporary era individuals always plan to decrease time they spend on their ways to destination, subsequently their option is more likely to be railways rather than roads. For instance, what my family and I do prefer to travel by train due to this, we seek for the nearest available railway to get our journey initiated. owing to mentioned concept investing higher amount of governmental budget in railways is more fruitful for citizens.
Second, most of trains would offer numerous availabilities for travelers to feel comfortable within the time they should spend on the road. According to this phenomenon their decision will be on the basis of comfort they experience as they are able to sleep on bed, watch movies and allocate their time to their daily tasks they have planned for. Namely, one of my close friends who has to take different travels due to her occupation, would have trains as a priority so she does not find her time getting wasted. Therefore, what heads of government are able to do is developing railways just for people's preference.
All in all, vast majority of citizen population believe that spending money on railways needs to be concentrated on more than roads. Although dedicating government budget on railways would be more expensive, it is more effective to do so due to the opportunities it brings as an analogy being made between these two options. from my perspective I strongly recommend governmental consultants to implement such interventions as it is just reaping the benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Many people opine that it is necessary f...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to be taken into consideration more. First, speed is one of the most signific...
^^^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ransportation choose for their travels. in contemporary era individuals always pla...
^^
Line 3, column 474, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Owing
...e railway to get our journey initiated. owing to mentioned concept investing higher a...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lways is more fruitful for citizens. Second, most of trains would offer numer...
^^^
Line 5, column 12, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the trains') or simply say ''most trains''.
Suggestion: most of the trains; most trains
...re fruitful for citizens. Second, most of trains would offer numerous availabilities for...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... railways just for peoples preference. All in all, vast majority of citizen ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 329, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: From
...y being made between these two options. from my perspective I strongly recommend gov...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, therefore, as to, for instance, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1798.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10795454545 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94690883711 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573863636364 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1487313635 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.866666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4666666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238131936767 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831077522254 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584401619178 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144485888153 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039074459711 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.