Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In numerous countries, the national investment to enhance the railway system is preferable to utilizing it to strengthen the transport infrastructures. I totally agree with this statement because of the following reasons.
Initially, it is undeniable that expending money on the cutting-edge train system means that people can get around their nation faster and more convenient. This is a result of the reduction in congestion that most road users experience, as well as the fact that trains can reach a much higher speed than cars. Moreover, people would consume less time commuting and save more time to focus on their work, this impact not only increases their work's quality but also benefits the entire society. For instance, the British Government recently unveiled a plan to connect London with the North of England via a high-speed rail network, allowing thousands of people in the Midlands to work in London.
In the comparison with cars, locomotives show the tendency to be less harmful to the environment. This is due to the fact that a train can carry hundreds of passengers, leading to the prevention of internal combustion engines using, thus reducing the amount of carbon emission. As there has been an outburst in population, this solution might decrease the carbon footprint significantly. For example, Hochi Minh City will soon inaugurate its first underground metro service, resulting in the reduction of the number of private vehicles on the road.
To summarize, governments should divert more funds to railway systems and investigate less on transport infrastructures as this not only improve living standards but also be less harmful to the environment.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, then, thus, well, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28464419476 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95132036729 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621722846442 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2045893296 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.272727273 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27272727273 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173788153685 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633525879228 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545682004489 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106549847659 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339961510826 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.