Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement

Essay topics:

Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Is is said that railways are more convenient than roads and more money should be spent by the authorities on development of this system instead of roadways. Considering this aforementioned assertion, in this essay, the upcoming paragraphs shall discuss merits and demerits of railroads.

To commence with, there are numerous reasons that support this belief and the prime one is that trains can transport entities at a faster rate compared to road conduction. To illustrate, vehicles on road such as trucks slow down when they are loaded with heavy things, whereas, train speed is not affected by the weights of the items it is carrying which leads to swift conveyance of articles. Secondly, movement of objects can be done in large quantities as train boxes have ample amount of space in them to fit more or huge commodities and extra carriages can be added if there are additional things. But in case of road transport, a fixed load can be transferred no more than that.

On the other hand, to support why I partially disagree with the statement the causes are that during extreme weather conditions, it can become a challenge to use trains. To elaborate, in the course of critical climate situations, for example, heavy snowfall, rainfall and others the clogged tracks are a big tasks to clear in contrast with roads resulting in delay in shipments. In addition, the maintenance of railway is expensive as the administration has to employ people to take care of stations and repairing tracks is needed annually since they are made of iron including other metals such as steel. However, roads do not require any of these above mentioned facilities even the restoration is needed after 5 years or so.

In conclusion, railway has its own advantages and disadvantages as well as roads have their own but emphasizing on any one them is not the solution, therefore, I moderately accord with the given declaration.

Votes
Average: 9.2 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: Is
Is is said that railways are more convenient ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 116, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...roads have their own but emphasizing on any one them is not the solution, therefore, I ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98130841121 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84325219334 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613707165109 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.8520064137 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.363636364 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1818181818 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.0 7.06120827912 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210325361757 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742397781198 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486086030325 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119256710094 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451831632355 0.056905535591 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.