With the ever increasing demand for a well-established transport system, expenditure on transport has been discussed. Some people argue that more money should be spent on railways than roads, while I disagree with this idea and I believe that both constructions should be emphasized.
There are a variety of reasons for supporters to emphasize the importance of railway transportation. Firstly, with high speeds, railways could reduce the time spent on commuting and improve the efficiency of transportation. Secondly, the railway system is so specifically designed that no traffic jams could occur. Finally, compared with the road transport system, railways are safer, dramatically reducing traffic accidents. However, if there is an unlimited explosion of underground space, the city would be potentially in danger, since a collapse would happen whenever and wherever.
Nevertheless, the road provides more convenient transport for people in comparison with other types of transportation. When people go somewhere that is not far away from their home, they can ride a bike or walk, which is feasible and environmentally-friendly. Furthermore, road transportation makes it possible for them to access small brounches of roads that lead them to their destinations directly. For example, residents could arrive at the gate of supermarkets by their vehicles and it is accessible for commuters to take a cab at their company's entrance without walking a few minutes to stations nearby.
In conclusion, both railways and road transportation play a vital role in the development of a city and both of them should be emphasized.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.524 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45389982484 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7854357701 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.083333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13559822274 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516334667949 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539286186964 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0926821139549 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381596679143 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.