Feedback of teachers paly a vital role in students' learning process. Some people argue that feedback should be given on good work by language teacher, while I do not wuite agree with this idea and I believe that language teacher should focus equally on giving feedback to both good work and bad whether.
The arguement in favour of emphasize on good work would be that giving prise and review to good work can serve as a movitation that encourages students to achieve more. When receiving desirable feedbacks, student may gain more confidence, thus help them overcome difficulties and work more effectively. For example, if students can receive a possive feedback in their language expression, they could thus be more confident and have more practice to communicate with others. Yet there are downsides when language teachers only give feedbacks to good work, since students would become too self-esteem to rectify their wrongdoings. Consiquently, it would be hard for them to learn from their experience and improve.
Nevertheless, appropriet criticise on student's bad work are far cry on their overall development. To start wtih, helping students realize their mistakes in work could allow them to accept the fact that there is not always perfect things. Besides, if students can recognize their error from teachers advice and reviews, they could correct their working method and take mmore measures to avoid mistakes the next time. For example, students can choose another proper words to complete a sentence or have conversation with others when their first try failed. With those they learned from their experience, they could make prominent breakthroughs. What's more, language is intimately bound up with culture, thus it is crucial for language teachers to retify student's recognization on one culture through language and help them perform well in langauge interaction.
In conclusion, language teachers cannot only give feedbacks on good work and I believe that equal feedbacks should be given on both good work and bad work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
... paly a vital role in students learning process. Some people argue that feedback should...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 644, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...hey could make prominent breakthroughs. Whats more, language is intimately bound up w...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 807, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nization on one culture through language and help them perform well in langauge i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28923076923 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68632478089 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547692307692 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0428050843 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.785714286 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404403521039 0.244688304435 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152556107478 0.084324248473 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118679680124 0.0667982634062 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305973624969 0.151304729494 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0983189733867 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.