Language teachers should concentrate on giving positive feedback to students when they do good work, rather than on criticising bad work. Do you agree or disagree?
Teachers play a critical role in shaping students’ careers because they are responsible for their students in many ways. Some people claim that language teachers should mostly praise students for progress and not pay much attention to failures. In my opinion, I completely agree with this statement. In this essay I will provide some arguments on support of my point of view.
Firstly, teachers should concentrate on success of the students in order to encourage them to learn languages. This method will set students up in a positive way and they will try their best to hear the words of praise. For example, if Alice gets an excellent result for the test and her teacher gives a positive feedback, next time she will try to repeat the success or even complete it better. We can see that praise strongly motivates students to study.
Another point to consider is that praise can build character. Positive feedback is not only used to praise students’ efforts, but is also an effective way to modify behavior. For instance, this way the teacher can establish contact with the student and avoid possible conflicts in the future. Moreover, this can help one to work with a child that is difficult to teach and attract them to study.
In conclusion, giving positive feedback to students has many benefits as it motivates them to study well and causes more respectful teacher- student interactions to occur. The main principle of this teaching policy is not to overdo it with praise.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...uages. This method will set students up in a positive way and they will try their best to hear th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'betters', 'wells'?
Suggestion: betters; wells
... repeat the success or even complete it better. We can see that praise strongly motiva...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9561752988 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59674172192 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577689243028 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3498449032 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8571428571 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9285714286 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204373383303 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684271478314 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487097834342 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127206377977 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199148020167 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.