THE GROWING NUMBER OF PEOPLE FEEL THAT ANIMALS SHOULD NOT BE EXPLOITED BY PEOPLE WHILE OTHERS ARGUE THAT HUMANS MUST EMPLOY ANIMALS TO SATISFY THEIR VARIOUS NEEDS, INCLUDING FOR FOOD, AND RESEARCH.
The relationship between animals and humans is not only very conflicting, but also creating a high criticism. Some people do not prefer that they are used for our mean purposes while others consider their exploitation to comply with our need is a fair deal. This essay will discuss both perspectives and outline how this immoral activity can be reduced.
As far as personal requirements are concerned, we had a closed depending relationship with animals from the evolution. Indeed, food is one of the very basic and a highly admiring reason why we keep animal in captivity, and induce their mass production. If this source is banned, the majority of people have to either switch to vegeterian diet or suffer from starvation.This not it, but animals also used for medical and cosmetic research and testing. Effects and consequences of the product are first tested on animals in order to determine safety and toxicity.If results from the test are positive, then only the product used in human.
On the other side, animals are sensible organisms because they can feel and express. Indeed, it is unfair to decimate them for unnecessary reasons. The one of far-reaching solutions is to decrease meat consumption by reducing at least a meat-based meal every week, we can bring a significant change. In terms of their involvement in research field, promoting the usage of the non-animals tested, or non-animal based products would encourage the less harm to them. In Australia, for instance, the popularity of plant-based products is on the increase, due to this reason.
Overall, although our reliance on animals is enormous, the adoption of good habits can make the way they are used more safer and fairer. Hence, we should develop animal-friendly attitude.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 369, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...geterian diet or suffer from starvation.This not it, but animals also used for medic...
^^^^
Line 2, column 561, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: If
... order to determine safety and toxicity.If results from the test are positive, the...
^^
Line 6, column 115, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'safer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: safer
...d habits can make the way they are used more safer and fairer. Hence, we should develop an...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, then, while, at least, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13240418118 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90096000732 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627177700348 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7475405606 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.214285714 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263912224727 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825271357195 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499156171523 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149226590784 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313267901389 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.