The notion of whether or not the exploitation of animals should be conducted has risen many debates from people and scientists from all around the world. There are both sides of this argument and I will discuss them in this essay.
Let us start by looking at some major drawbacks of killing animals to serve various purposes. First of all, the amount of animals is obviously limited and the freely animal execution will severely damage our natural ecology. It has been reported that since people are giving the rights to their own self to manipulate and take advantage of other kinds of living things, there is a significant drop in the number of animals, some may even become extinct. For example, according to many history researches, the appearance of human in any area affected the natural habitat of the other creatures, which caused them to die out slowly. Moreover, most animals and plants are interdependent, which means that if some of them begin to disappear, the other could not survive as well. As we have known, the bees somehow are responsible for the reproducing cycle of the flowers.
On the other hand, because of the importance of new scientific researches, animals are sacrificed in order that a type of products or drugs can be commercialized. In fact, most medicines people intaking every day that has been verified after a long process are tested on animals. How do we know if an aspirin could reduce pain and cure other ailments, without letting a monkey or a lab rat uses it first? Furthermore, people need to survive through the rigor of weather as it keeps changing every year. Meat comes from animals is rich in nutrients, which could help us to keep our body healthy without vitamins deficiency and malnutrition.
In conclusion, there are both merits and demerits in this issue. Personally, I think that it is feasible to employ animals for our needs, but we should do it in moderation in order that no animals will be endangered.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 15, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
The notion of whether or not the exploitation of animals should be c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, so, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, in fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83976261128 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66701701802 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587537091988 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0849526388 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.733333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4666666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.13333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269788847897 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748760211494 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584064706945 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157117173594 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031494493538 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.