A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Give reasons from your own experience and examples where relevant.
Many people claim that, animals should be treated in the way of humans, whereas others believe that, we should use animals for food, and scientific research. Let us examine both views before reaching a concrete decision.
It is true that, humans have no moral right to do experiments on animals, and they have a similar right to live. However, researchers may find alternative methods of research, which could help to reduce killing and suffering them. Consequently, it will affect wildlife habitats. For example, a recent study by Queen’s University found that the extinction of different species animals due to animal testing and killing for different purposes. What is more, it has also been proven that humans can get all the nutrients, vitamin and protein from vegetables and fruits. Thus, killing animals for food would not be a strong reason.
On the other hand, animal testing helps to advance medical and scientific knowledge. Many important medical discoveries involved experimentation on animals. One clear example is finding the treatments of many diseases. If medical and scientific research has not been developed, humans suffering from illness could have not been cured. For this reason, medical tests and scientific studies are crucial on new drugs. In the USA, for instance, scientists found new elements of the cancer investigation, and they might have to do a test on animals. Furthermore, people think that everything on the earth must be done to ensure human survival, so if we use animals for food and other uses, then this morally acceptable.
To conclude, although, some people argue that killing animals for food and studies is ethical; I would say that it is completely natural for us to kill animals for food. But I would not support testing for the cosmetics and clothes industries.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, it is true, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20677966102 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74740691512 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583050847458 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8972042428 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3529411765 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3529411765 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88235294118 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333220864679 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924629863266 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0984001105919 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216861032129 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471744966126 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.