Modern scientist need specialist in certain fields not in others. Some people think that government should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society. Those who choose to study less relevant subjects should not receive government funding. Would the advantages of such an educational policy outweigh the disadvantages?
Some people claim that pupils who choose areas that are essential for the community should get state authority's support. This essay will argue that the disadvantages of this outweigh the drawbacks.
On the one hand, I believe that all students must be valued equally and all humans have the right to earn funds to continue their learning. Although, the government funding has encouraged scholars to do research or higher study on a specific field they select, because without state helps they cannot carry out the cost of the investigation, but it should not be limited in specific fields that help the society. In other words, if the state government has signed this protocol, the literacy rate could have been decreased. This certainly affects the country's overall economy. Another demerit would be, the competition in job markets will increase for a specific job, and that must be raised the unemployment rank. For instance, when we get support in specific areas we will definitely continue to study those courses, so the majority of students will do. As a result, during a job search, there would be more people for a single vacancy, so many people will remain jobless.
On the other hand, this scheme will bring few benefits to a specific discipline, such as, health care. As many people can get involved in this sector, this certainly helps to improve the services in hospitals and diagnostic centres. For example, sometimes we see that people in small cities do not get proper treatment due to specialist doctors. If scholars get ministry help to study in medical science, medical management in countries could have been developed.
In conclusion, however, this approach has few merits, but it has more problems. Thus, I think the law should not be applied for just a few profits, which will cause many uprising dilemmas.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, thus, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0262295082 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58491686836 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573770491803 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9843472753 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.2 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163271934219 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523699780304 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515179800748 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101510979691 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348125139796 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.