Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries. Do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that skilled and knowledgeable people from developing countries should get more opportunities by developed countries. While I agree that it may solve many problems, such as unemployment in those countries.
On the one hand, the advent of globalization, many people have approached towards the wealthy countries rather than being unemployed in their own countries, for instance, Japan, Australia, and Canada now are allowing skilful workers in their countries in terms of job visa. Consequently, it helps both countries to stimulate economic growth; moreover, it makes the strong relationship between two countries. Furthermore, as work opportunities improve, the crime rate will fall in poor countries, which may lead them to earn reputation around the world.
On the other hand, granting employees from underprivileged nations will assist to develop the economic rise, as well as, they can use their knowledge in different sectors, namely, management, engineering, and construction. For example, Google and many renowned companies recruit employees from different countries who contribute to their company’s profit and reputation. Sundar Pichai, is an Indian American business executive and the chief executive officer of Alphabet Inc, and its subsidiary Google LLC. In addition, it also benefited to know diverse cultures and ethical values that remove the cultural gap between human beings.
In conclusion, trained employees not only beneficial to their own country, but also they create values for their country to the outside world. From my point of view, unemployment is one of the vital issues in developing countries, and it can be solved somehow by sending experienced people in rich countries.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63218390805 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02413674176 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64367816092 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2839398038 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.636363636 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.1818181818 7.06120827912 215% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256088675354 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840657893797 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680894094 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147318756995 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190939505677 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.