Insufficient housing in major cities has been one of the pressing issues that can lead to negative effects on society. Some people assume that this issue can be solely handled by governments. From my perspective, I agree with the statement to some extent.
To begin with, there are several reasons resulting in the lack of accommodation in cities. The first one is the ever-increasing population. As people in rural areas tend to move to larger cities for prosperity, the current infrastructure of those cities fails to catch up with the demographic expansion, causing the shortage of houses. Another reason that should be taken into consideration is the poor management of authorities. It is not uncommon in third countries that their governments have primarily allocated their budgets to short-term programmes rather than long-term ones, which would contribute to the lack of money needed for public construction.
As a result, only governments can deal with the abovementioned culprits to solve the problem of housing shortage. The primary method is that a massive investment must be utilized to build a system of public infrastructure, allowing citizens better access to essential facilities. Therefore, it is unnecessary for them to stay in major cities. The Japanese authorities have imposed multiple financial schemes, establishing public constructions like the Metro, in Tokyo. For that reason, people living in the vicinity can effortlessly commute to their workplaces that are located in the heart of Tokyo thanks to the high-speed railway system.
In conclusion, I believe that governments play an irreplaceable role in dealing with the lack of houses in major cities. A heavy investment should be enacted to build and improve infrastructure, limiting people to live in big cities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, so, therefore, third, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39145907473 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18554838198 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608540925267 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1632889228 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223910518601 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684015366686 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731044221431 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131204852735 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648681750722 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.