Human beings do not need to eat meat in order to maintain good health because they can get all their food needs from meatless products and meatless substitutes. A vegetation diet is as healthy as a diet containing meat. Argue for or against the opinion above.
It is argued that human for getting crucial ingredients and minerals have no necessity to put kinds of meat in their meals. While many people hold the view that the herbal diet is as same as meat including diet, others are believed that it is not true. My personal idea is agreed with the former position. In this essay I will put Force some reasons to support my view before arriving at conclusion.
To begin with, in botanical foods and ingredients there are the same minerals and vitamins which can be founded in meat. Although plants and animals have distinguished superficial features, their fundamental materials are the same in tiny cellulars. But the portion of various minerals are different. For instance in meat the average amount of Protein in per kilo is approximately 20 percent, while in vegetables is less than 5 percent in per kilo. Therefore, for receiving enough minerals, just a great portion of vegetables should be consumed.
Another reason for my position is the rate of harmful components which are found in vegetarian and meat diets. Since the constructive materials of meats and plants are the same, so both of groups have harmful and beneficial materials. Nevertheless, the amount of harmful factors are considerably less in plants. For example Urea-acid which can cause fundamental Damage on kidneys and it can be existed in meat in high rate in per kilo. As a result, eating vegetarian diet even in hug amount can not pose a severe damage and is healthier than meat diet.
In conclusion, given the above consideration, not only are plants and fruits in compare of meat more reliable for daily consumption, but also flora diets have always been recommended by dietitians. Due to the almost zero percent of harmful effect on human body.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92953020134 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76516786587 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56711409396 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2533942376 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8125 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237341616162 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714738169126 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596411346286 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140755111345 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227252012304 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.